The High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' representation dated 03.06.2016 and pass an appropriate order within three months of the order date under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.
Respondents directed to consider representation dated 03.06.2016 and pass order within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 108308 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 108308 OF 2016 (LA-RES)
BETWEEN:
S/O RAMAPPA KATTIKAR, AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE/COOLIE, R/O. CHIRALAKOPPA, NOW AT RADDER THIMMAPUR, TQ: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587155.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. Y R JOGI, ADVOCATE)
CHANDRASHEKARLAXMANKATTIMANI Digitally signed byCHANDRASHEKARLAXMANKATTIMANIDate: 2023.01.14 11:27:47 +0530
AND:
WP No. 108308 of 2016
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRASHANT V.MOGALI, HCGP FOR R2 AND R3; PETITION AGAINST R1 DISMISSED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO: DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONISDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED:03.06.2016, VIDE ANENXURES-G AND G1 FILED BY THE PETITIONER NO.1.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B- GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:
“Issue writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 03.06.2016, Vide Anenxures-G and G1 filed by the petitioner No.1.
Any other and further relief as this Honorable Court deems fit and just in the ends of justice”
WP No. 108308 of 2016
and learned HCGP for the respondents No.2 and 3. Perused the material on record.
WP No. 108308 of 2016
period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands
disposed off.
SD JUDGE
CLK
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 84
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petitioners must be directed to consider their representation dated 03.06.2016 and pass an order.
Whether respondents must address grievances within a specified time frame.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI.SIDDAPPA
SRI.SURESH
THE UNION OF INDIA
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BAGALKOT DISTRICT
THE TAHASHILDAR, BADAMI
S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
