Disposed

Irappa S/O Rayappa Kadampur v. the Deputy Commissioner

Karnataka HC11 Jan 2023WP/100149/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court passed an order in a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, directing the respondent authorities to consider the petitioners' pending representations and pass an appropriate order within three months.

What did the court decide?

Directing the respondents to consider the representations dated 25.02.2020 and pass an appropriate order within three months.

Irappa S/O Rayappa Kadampur Vs the Deputy… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

WP No. 100149 of 2022

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

¶4

DATED THIS THE 11^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 100149 OF 2022 (LA-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

IRAPPA S/O RAYAPPA KADAMPUR, AGE. 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. MUCHAKHANDI VILLAGE, NOW RESIDING AT FARM HOUSE, NEAR SHIVASANGAM HOTEL, BAGALKOT, TQ. DIST. BAGALKOT.

¶9

CHANNABASAPPA S/O BASAPPA CHANGALI AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. FARM HOUSE, NEAR BAGALKOT-VIDHYGIRI BYPASS ROAD, TQ. DIST. BAGALKOT.

¶10

…PETITIONERS

¶11

(BY SRI. LINGRAJ MARADI, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

CHANDRASHEKARLAXMANKATTIMANI Digitally signed byCHANDRASHEKARLAXMANKATTIMANIDate: 2023.01.1411:16:43 +0530

¶14

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BAGALKOT.

¶15

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BAGALKOT TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, OFFICE, BAGALKOT.

¶16

THE CHIEF ENGINEER, BAGALKOT TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BAGALKOT, DIST. BAGALKOT.

¶17

…RESPONDENTS

¶18

(BY SRI. PRASHANT V.MOGALI, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. G.K.HIREGOUDAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND 3)

¶19

¶20

WP No. 100149 of 2022

¶21

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 3 AUTHORITIES TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25.02.2020 AND 25.02.2020 VIDE ANNEXURES-B AND B1.

¶22

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B- GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶23

ORDER

¶24

In this writ petition, the petitioners have sought for the following reliefs:

¶25

“Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.1 to 3 authorities to consider the representation dated 25.02.2020 and 25.02.2020 vide Annexures-B and B1.

¶26

Any other and further relief as this Honorable Court deems fit and just in the ends of justice.”

¶27

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners

¶28

and learned HCGP for respondent No.1 and learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3. Perused the material on record.

¶29

¶30

WP No. 100149 of 2022

¶31

It is the grievance of the petitioners that their representations dated 25.02.2020 and 25.02.2020 at Annexures-B and B3 submitted to the respondents have not been considered so far by them nor any order has been passed on the same. Under these circumstances, the petitioners are before this Court by way of the present petition.

¶32

Per contra , learned counsel for the

¶33

respondents submits that if reasonable time is given, they would consider and pass necessary order on the said representations.

¶34

In view of the aforesaid facts and

¶35

circumstances and rival submissions, the respondents are hereby directed to address the grievances of the petitioners and consider their representations dated 25.02.2020 and 25.02.2020 at Annexure-B and B1 respectively and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶36

¶37

WP No. 100149 of 2022

¶38

With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands

¶39

disposed off.

¶40

SD JUDGE

¶41

CLK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 87

Irappa S/O Rayappa Kadampur v. the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Irappa S/O Rayappa Kadampur v. the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.Shri.Chandrakant S/O Jaypal Ramgouda Vs Smt.Kasturi Wd/O Suresh Ramgouda

Bhagyashree D/O. Chandappa Hadikar Vs the Bagalkot District Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd.

Durgappa S/O Tualasavva Madar Vs Vivekanand S/O Mahadev Havalakod

Shri. Suresh S/O. Sheshangouda, Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Sri.Siddappa Vs the Union of India.

Mahadevi W/O Adiveppa Asannavar Vs Lamxna S/O Arjun Metri