The Karnataka High Court dismissed this writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution as withdrawn. The court accepted a memo from petitioner counsel stating the matter was settled amicably. No substantive decision on the loan dispute was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 10491 OF 2022 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPAY OUTSTANDING LOAN AMOUNT AS PER ANNEXURE-F DATED 2.5.2022 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL):
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 03.10.2023 stating that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties and therefore, the petitioner does not press the writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
rv
CT: BHK
SRI. SAGADEVAN RAJESH KUMAR
SMT. K. V. KALAVATHI
I.C.I.C.I. BANK LIMITED
R DEVDAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
