The Chief Commissioner Bbmp v. State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Hearing a writ appeal challenging a single judge order directing Respondent-1 to consider a representation similar to that of the writ petitioner, the Bench rejected the appeal in limine due to lack of merits and the single judge's non-expression of opinion on the matter.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was rejected in limine with directions to send a copy to the second respondent.
What the court decided
- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC:37781-DB WA No. 977 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT
WRIT APPEAL NO. 977 OF 2023 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER BBMP, OFFICE AT BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N R SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 002.
…APPELLANT
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the single judge's order directing the department to consider a representation similar to that of the writ petitioner is maintainable.
Whether the requirement of a bank guarantee by the petitioner requires deeper examination in appeal.
Whether discriminatory treatment of similarly circumstanced builders violates Article 14 of the Constitution.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER BBMP
- respondent
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT
- respondent
M/S VAGESHWARI LAND DEVELOPERS (P) LTD
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- WA/977/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court