The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a Regular Second Appeal filed in 2018 for non-prosecution and non-compliance with office objections after five years without representation.
Dismissing the Regular Second Appeal for non-prosecution and non-compliance of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA No. 500 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MAY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.500 OF 2018 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. SURESH D DESHPANDE., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
RSA No. 500 of 2018
AND:
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT THOTADAMANE, B.G. NAGAR, BELLURU HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 432.
RSA No. 500 of 2018
W/O. LATE B.M. AMEERULLA KHAN, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF KANTHARAJA URS ROAD, BELLUR TOWN, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 432.
RSA No. 500 of 2018
GONDENAHALLI POST, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 432.
ALSO ARASIKERE TOWN, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. N P KALLESH GOWDA ., ADVOCATE FOR C/R10)
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CPC., SEEKING CERTAIN RELEIFS.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
When the matter is called there is no representation on behalf of appellants.
The appeal is listed today for orders regarding noncompliance of office objections for third time.
As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2018. Now we are in the month of May 2023. It's been five years. So far, office objections are not complied with.
It appears that the appellants have not instructed the counsel on record to comply office objections and appellants are not diligent in prosecuting the appeal.
RSA No. 500 of 2018
As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of appellants. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/JUDGE
TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4
Smt. Nagamma w/o. Late Narasimhegowda
Smt. Ningamma w/o. Late Krishnappa
Smt. Jayamma w/o. Narasimhegowda
B. N. Padmavathi
B. N. Priyadarsini
B. N. Manjunatha
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
