Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Haziz Ahmed Vs Mustaq Ahmed — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2023)

Home
Karnataka HC
2023
Haziz Ahmed Vs Mustaq AhmedHaziz Ahmed v. Mustaq Ahmed

Dismissed

Haziz Ahmed v. Mustaq Ahmed

Karnataka HC22 May 2023RSA/1654/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution and failure to comply with office objections despite multiple listings and time granted.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

1 -

RSA No. 1654 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 22^ND DAY OF MAY, 2023

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1654 OF 2016 (INJ)

BETWEEN:

HAZIZ AHMED S/O GULAM MOHIDDIN, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS.

FAYAZ AHMED S/O GULAM MOHIDDIN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

ALL ARE R/O BANAVARA PETE, BANAVARA TOWN, ARSIKERE TALUK. …APPELLANTS

[(BY SRI.JAGADEESH H.T., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)]

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
Haziz Ahmed S/o Gulam Mohiddin
appellant
Fayaz Ahmed S/o Gulam Mohiddin
respondent
Mustaq Ahmed S/o Rashid Ahmed
respondent
Harshid Ahmed S/o Rashid Ahmed
respondent
Irshad Ahmed S/o Rashid Ahmed
respondent

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 22 May 2023 · May
Registered: 22 Sept 2016
Case no.: RSA/1654/2016

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Jyoti M

Mrs. Lata Amashi Vs Nil
2 Feb 2023
Mrs Mariamma Thomas Vs Nil
2 Feb 2023
Sri K Murali Vs Nil
1 Feb 2023
Srinivasappa Vs Sri. Munirajappa
22 May 2023
Sri Mohammed Haneef Vs Smt Dilshad Jan

Cite this judgement

Haziz Ahmed v. Mustaq Ahmed, RSA/1654/2016 (KA), decided on 22 May 2023.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Jyoti Mulimani

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Regular Second Appeal No. 1654 of 2016 dismissed for non-prosecution and failure to comply with office objections. The appellants, having been listed twice to comply, failed to do so, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

AND:

Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

MUSTAQ AHMED S/O RASHID AHMED, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.

HARSHID AHMED S/O RASHID AHMED, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS.

IRSHAD AHMED S/O RASHID AHMED, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS.

YASMIN BHANU D/O RASHID AHMED AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

2 -

RSA No. 1654 of 2016

ALL ARE R/O SHIVAJINAGAR, BIRUR, CHIKAMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 201.

RAFIQ AHMED S/O GULAM AHMED, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, BANAVARA PETE, BANAVARA TOWN, ARSIKERE TALUK. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. RAMESH H.E., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1; SRI P.M.SIDDAMALLAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 AND ALSO FOR R2 & R3)

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of appellants.

The appeal is listed today for orders non-compliance of office objections.

As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 10.10.2022 and 10 days time was granted to comply office objections, failing which it was ordered to be listed for dismissal.

3 -

RSA No. 1654 of 2016

The appeal is listed today. So far, office objections are not complied with. It appears that the appellants have not instructed the counsel on record to comply office objections and appellants are not diligent in prosecuting the appeal.

As already noted above, though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of appellants and in view of earlier peremptory order, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections.

Sd/JUDGE

TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34

Yasmin Bhanu D/o Rashid Ahmed

Coram

AI extract

Jyoti Mulimani

CNR

KAHC010412272016

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Disposal

Dismissal for Non Compliance of Office Objections

22 May 2023

Revanappa Vs K v Virupakshappa

24 May 2023