The High Court of Karnataka dismissed an appeal for non-compliance of office objections despite an order granting extension. The judgment contains no substantive legal reasoning beyond the procedural default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
R.S.A.NO.480/2018 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
APPELLANT NOS.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT KALLAHALLI VILLAGE, CHAMARAJANAGAR … APPELLANTS
[BY SRI A.M.SURYAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE]
AND:
2
R/AT KALLAHALLI VILLAGE, CHAMARAJANAGAR - 571 313
CHAMARAJANAGAR TQ & DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS
THIS R.S.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.04.2017 PASSED IN RA.NO.85/2012, ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM., CHAMARAJANAGAR, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.08.2012 PASSED IN OS.NO.279/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., CHAMARAJANAGAR.
3
THIS R.S.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
This Court, vide order dated 25.10.2021, finally granted two weeks’ time to comply with the office objections, failing which list this matter for dismissal. Even though two weeks’ time was granted on 25.10.2021, the office objections are not complied.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/JUDGE
ST
Sri. Shivarudra
Srid. Sivaramu
Sri Nagaraju
Sri. Siddaiya
Sri Mahadevaiah (Doddabhadraiah)
Smt. Puttaveeramma
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
