The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants as not pressed after counsel filed a memo stating the matter was settled between the parties. Court fee was ordered refunded.
Court fee to be refunded to the appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
R.S.A.NO.129/2019 (SP)
BETWEEN:
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 001
DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 001
DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 001
AGED 32 YEARS
R/AT CHOWDAPURA VILLAGE
2
AND:
3 . SRI MANJAPPA S/O CHOWDAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS ADVOCATE AND AGRICULTURIST R/O SHABANUR VILLAGE DAVANAGERE TALUK & DISTRICT.
DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 001.
5 . KUMAR R., S/O RUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O SHABANUR VILLAGE DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT-577 001
3
10 . MADHU @ MADAKARI NAYAKA S/O DURUGAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O SHABANUR VILLAGE DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT-577 001
4
11 . KUM. SAHANA S/O RAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS STUDENT R/O SHABANUR VILLAGE DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT-577 001
12 . KUMARA SANJAY S/O RAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS STUDENT R/O SHABANUR VILLAGE DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT-577 001
RESPONDENT NOS.11 AND 12 SINCE MINORS REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT.GEETHAMMA
13 . SMT. K.C. MANJULA W/O S. RUDRESHI AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O SHABANUR VILLAGE DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT-577 001. ... RESPONDENTS
[BY SRI B.M.ARUN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2, R4, R7, R10, R13 - SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; R11 AND R12 ARE MINORS, REP. BY GUARDIAN SMT.GEETHAMMA]
THIS R.S.A., IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.11.2018 PASSED IN R.A.NO.48/2015, ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DAVANAGERE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.04.2015 PASSED IN O.S.NO.30/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM., DAVANAGERE.
5
THIS R.S.A., COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel appearing for the appellants has filed
a memo dated 05.01.2023 praying this Court to dismiss the appeal as the matter is settled between the parties.
In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Office is directed to refund the Court Fee in favour of the appellants as per law.
In view of dismissal of the appeal, I.As, if any do not survive for consideration.
Sd/JUDGE
cp*
K. Siddappa S/o Hanumappa & Others
Mudegowdra Veerabhadrappa & Others
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
