purchased on 29.07.1962. On the other hand, defendant No.14 contends that the suit ‘A’ schedule property is the self acquired property of the father of the plaintiff and after the purchase of the property, defendant No.14 invested the money and formed the layout and sold some of the sites. When the plaintiff has filed the suit for the relief of partition and separate possession and pleaded that the suit schedule properties are the joint family properties, the plaintiff has to establish the same that the suit schedule properties are the joint family properties of plaintiff and defendants. In order to substantiate the said contention, no document has been placed before the Court, except producing the document of sale deed dated 06.10.2005 and copy of RTC. In order to prove the fact that the family was having joint family properties and out of the joint nucleus the suit schedule properties are purchased, no document is placed before the Court. Hence, the Trial Court came to the conclusion that mere pleading is not enough and the plaintiff has to establish that the suit schedule properties are purchased out of joint
