Dismissed

Sri Bangaru v. Sri Lingaiah Since Deceased by Lrs

Karnataka HC1 Jun 2023RSA/2372/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a regular second appeal for non-compliance with office objections. Despite being given opportunities and time extensions, the appellants failed to address the objections, leading the court to find them undiligent and dismiss the appeal.

What did the court decide?

Regular Second Appeal No. 2372 of 2018 dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.

Sri Bangaru Vs Sri Lingaiah Since Deceased… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

RSA No. 2372 of 2018

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF JUNE, 2023 BEFORE

¶4

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI

¶5

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.2372 OF 2018 (INJ)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SRI. BANGARU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,

¶8

SRI. RAJU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

¶9

SRI. ANANDARAJU AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

¶10

SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

¶11

ALL ARE SONS OF SRI.NANJUNDAIAH, RESIDENT OF GOWDAHALLI, YELANDUR TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT.

¶12

…APPELLANTS

¶13

Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

(BY SRI. S. SUBHASH, ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

SRI. LINGAIAH SINCE DECEASED BY LRS

¶17

1(A). SMT. PUTTANANJAMMA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,

¶18

1(B). SMT. RADHAPUTTI AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

¶19

1(C). SMT. NINGARAJAMMA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

¶20

¶21

RSA No. 2372 of 2018

¶22

1(D). SRI. NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,

¶23

RESPONDENT 1(A) IS THE WIFE, RESPONDENT 1(B) AND 1(C) ARE THE DAUGHERS RESPONDENT 1(D) IS THE SON OF THE DECEASED SRI.LINGAIAH

¶24

…RESPONDENTS

¶25

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CPC., SEEKING CERTAIN RELEIFS.

¶26

THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶27

ORDER

¶28

Sri.S.Subhash., learned counsel for appellants has appeared in person.

¶29

The captioned appeal is listed today for orders regarding dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections.

¶30

Learned counsel for appellants submits that short accommodation may be granted to comply office objections.

¶31

Submission is noted.

¶32

As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 25.05.2023 and finally a week's time was granted

¶33

¶34

RSA No. 2372 of 2018

¶35

to comply office objections, failing which office was directed to list this matter for dismissal on 01.06.2023.

¶36

The appeal is listed today. So far, office objections are not complied with.

¶37

Despite giving several opportunities, appellants have not instructed the counsel on record to comply office objections. It appears that appellants are not diligent in prosecuting the appeal.

¶38

In view of earlier peremptory order dated:25.05.2023, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.

¶39

Sd/JUDGE

¶40

NR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17

Sri Bangaru v. Sri Lingaiah Since Deceased by Lrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Bangaru v. Sri Lingaiah Since Deceased by Lrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandru @ Chandrappa Vs Velliyamma

Channamma Vs Chetankumar

Sri B P Prasanth Vs Sri B N Krishnamurthy

Smt Sharadamma Vs Thimmakka Dead by Lrs

Smt Jayamma Vs Smt.Nanjamma

Sri K Naganaika Vs Smt Lakshmamma