Channamma v. Chetankumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular Second Appeal dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and failure to pay required court costs within the specified time frame.
What did the court decide?
The Regular Second Appeal was dismissed due to failure to comply with office objections and non-payment of costs.
What the court decided
- 1 -
RSA No. 176 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF MAY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.176 OF 2022 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
- CHANNAMMA W/O LATE MOTAPPA, AGED 75 YEARS, R/O NEELAKANTANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK - 571 428.
- NEELAMMA W/O BASAVARAJU, AGED 46 YEARS, R/O HALAGAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK - 571 428.
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Parties & counsel
- appellant
CHANNAMMA W/O LATE MOTAPPA
- appellant
NEELAMMA W/O BASAVARAJU
- appellant
RADHA D/O LATE MOTAPPA
- appellant
SHIVANNA S/O LATE MOTAPPA
- appellant
RAMALINGAIAH S/O LATE MOTAPPA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/176/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court