Smt Gulabi Shedthi v. Smt Narasi Poojarthi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka held that a Regular Second Appeal filed by Smt. Gulabi Shedthi stands abated as the sole respondent died in 2021 without her legal representatives being impleaded within a reasonable period.
What did the court decide?
The Regular Second Appeal stands abated.
What the court decided
NC: 2023:KHC:42479 RSA No. 2066 of 2011
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.2066 OF 2011 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
SMT. GULABI SHEDTHI, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, D/O PADDAKKA SHEDTHI, R/AT BALAKUDRU VILLAGE & POST, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT - 576 201.
…APPELLANT
(BY SMT.ARCHANA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. A. ANAND SHETTY., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. NARASI POOJARTHI, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, D/O LACHI POOJARTHY, PANDESHWARA VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT - 576 201.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Regular Second Appeal stands abated due to non-availability of legal representatives of the deceased respondent after a two-year delay.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Gulabi Shedthi
- respondent
Smt. Narasi Poojarthi
Coram
Jyoti Mulimani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/2066/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court