Sri S Abdul Rahiman v. Mrs. Bibijan Kassim
Case brief
What is this about?
The Karnataka High Court dismissed a regular second appeal that was set aside as withdrawn based on a memo filed by the appellant's counsel.
The Karnataka High Court dismissed a regular second appeal that was set aside as withdrawn based on a memo filed by the appellant's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA No. 158 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MAY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.158 OF 2016 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SRI S. ABDUL RAHIMAN AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, S/O LATE SHEIKH USMAN SAHEB, R/AT USMANIYA MANZIL, HIRIYANGADI ROAD, KARKALA KASABA VILLAGE, KARKALA TALUK-574 104, UDUPI DISTRICT.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SANGAMESH., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA.K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALL ARE R/AT ARGAT MANZIL, MIG SITE NO.24, 2ND MAIN CROSS, KUVEMPU NAGAR, HASSAN.
RSA No. 158 of 2016
6 TO 11 ARE CHILDREN OF LATE MRS. ZAIBUNISSA AZIZUDEEN AND 5 TO 11 ARE R/AT "MEHTAB COMPOUND", ANCHIKATTE, SALMAR, NEAR TALUK OFFICE, KARKALA-574 104, UDUPI DISTRICT.
RSA No. 158 of 2016
HIRIYANGADI ROAD, KARKALA KASBA VILLAGE, KARKALA TALUK-574 104.
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, D/O LATE ABDUL AZIZ, R/AT USMANIZ MANZIL, HIRIYANGADI ROAD, KARKALA KASBA VILLAGE, KARKALA TALUK-574 104.
RSA No. 158 of 2016
…RESPONDENTS
RSA No. 158 of 2016
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, SEEKING CERTAIN RELEIFS.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri.Sangamesh., learned counsel on behalf of
Sri.Chandrakanth Ariga.K., for appellant and Smt.Bharathi., learned counsel on behalf of Sri.Venkatesh R.Bhagat., for caveator/ respondent No.1 have appeared in person.
Counsel Sri.Sangamesh., submits that a memo has been filed on 12.07.2018 stating that there is instructions by the legal representatives of appellant to withdraw the appeal. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Submission is noted.
Memo is placed on record.
The Regular Second Appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri S. Abdul Rahiman
Mrs. Bibijan Kassim
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court