Smt Puttamma v. Smt Suma
Case brief
What is this about?
The Karnataka High Court dismissed a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the CPC for non-prosecution and failure to comply with office objections after five years.
What did the court decide?
Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and non-compliance of office objections.
What the court decided
- 1 -
RSA No. 1400 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF MAY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1400 OF 2018 (RES)
BETWEEN:
- SMT. PUTTAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O LATE THIMMEGOWDA,
- SMT.JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, W/O LATE THIMMEGOWDA,
- SMT. SUDHAMANI AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, D/O LATE THIMMEGOWDA,
- SRI MUKUNDA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, S/O LATE THIMMEGOWDA,
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Regular Second Appeal should be dismissed for non-prosecution and non-compliance of office objections.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SMT. PUTTAMMA
- appellant
SMT.JAYAMMA
- appellant
SMT. SUDHAMANI
- appellant
SRI MUKUNDA
- respondent
SMT. SUMA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/1400/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court