N Satyanarayana v. Chandrappa
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a Second Appeal for non-compliance with Office Objections regarding the ruby point on the completed cause title within the prescribed time limit.
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a Second Appeal for non-compliance with Office Objections regarding the ruby point on the completed cause title within the prescribed time limit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1490 OF 2018 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALL ARE R/O MAJJIGENAHALLI VILLAGE, BHADRAVATHI TALUK.
RSA No. 1490 of 2018
APPELLANT NOS.2 TO 6 ARE REPRESENTED BY G.P.A HOLDER APPELLANT NO.1.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI PREM KUMAR A.L., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. CHANDRAPPA, S/O MALLAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS.
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS.
BOTH ARE R/O MAJJIGENAHALLI VILLAGE, BHADRAVATHI TALUK.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS R.S.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT DECREE DATED 01.06.2018 PASSED IN R.A.NO.20/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., BHADRAVATHI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.04.2016 PASSED IN OS.NO.293/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., BHADRAVATHI. TRIAL COURT DISMISSED THE SUIT. APPELLATE COURT DISMISSED THE APPEAL. SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RSA No. 1490 of 2018
J U D G M E N T
This appeal was filed in the year 2018 and this Court vide order dated 28.10.2021, granted two weeks time to comply with the office objections, failing which to list the matter for dismissal. Inspite of the same, till date the office objections are not complied with. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for noncompliance of office objections.
Sd/JUDGE
MD List No.: 2 Sl No.: 20
N. Satyanarayana and others
Chandrappa and Anappa
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court