Sri B M Manjappa v. Sri B P Onkarappa
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka held that a Regular Second Appeal abated due to the death of the appellant and respondent, who failed to substitute legal representatives within the granted time.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC:38147 RSA No. 1446 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1446 OF 2011 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
SRI B.M.MANJAPPA S/O B.M.MANJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, B.BEERANAHALLI VILLAGE, HOLALOOR HOBLI, SHIMOGA TALUK, SHIMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 216.
…APPELLANT
(BY SMT.MOUNIKA M., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. A.NAGARAJAPPA & ASSTS.,)
AND:
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sri B.M.Manjappa
- respondent
Sri B.P.Onkarappa
Coram
Jyoti Mulimani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/1446/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court