Regular Second Appeal dismissing appeal due to settlement between parties documented via a compromise petition filed in a specific Family Dispute Petition.
The appeal was dismissed on the ground that the dispute between the parties was settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1097 OF 2018 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
W/O SRI.NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
APPELLANTS 13(A) TO (F) ARE RESIDING AT DODDAKOTHAGERE VILLAGE, BASARALU HOBLI,
MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571401.
G. SMT. CHANDARAMMA, D/O LATE YALAKKIGOWDA W/O SRI.NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT TAVAREKERE VILLAGE, KAMBADAHALLI PANCHYATHI, BASARALU HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571401.
AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS
APPELLANTS 1 TO 4, 6 TO 15 ARE RESIDING AT DODDAKOTHAGERE VILLAGE BASARALU HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571401
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. SHRIDHARAMURTHY H R & SRI.C.B. KOMAL KUMAR, ADVOCATES)
AND:
R3(A) TO 3(C) ARE RESIDING AT DODDAKOTHAGERE VILLAGE, BASARALU HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK MANDYA – 571401.
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
RESPONDENTS 1 TO 6 ARE RESIDING AT DODDAKOTHAGERE VILLAGE BASARALU HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571401
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.N.SHANKARANARAYANA BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R2; R3(A), R1, 4, 5 & 6 ARE SERVED & UNREPRESENTED; R3(B &C) ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY R3(A)).
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD 31.01.2018 PASSED IN R.A.NO. 8/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANDYA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 07.01.2014 PASSED IN OS.NO.227/1999 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE MANDYA.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo
duly signed by appellant No.16 indicating that dispute between the parties is settled before the trial Court in
terms of compromise petition filed in FDP.No.2/2021.
Memo is taken on record.
In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
CA
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21
SMT SANNAMMA W/O THIMMEGOWDA @ DODDONU
SRI RAJASHEKARA S/O THIMMEGOWDA
SRI T NAGARAJU S/O THIMMEGOWDA
SRI CHIKKATHAMMEGOWDA @ PAPANNA S/O KARIGOWDA
SMT JAYALAKSHMI W/O LATE RAJANNA
SRI MALLA S/O LATE RAJANNA
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
