In this review petition, the High Court of Karnataka dismissed the application for review of an order dated 12th April 2023. The court held that no error was apparent on the face of the record regarding the non-service of respondent No.1, relying on Apex Court precedents.
The review petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RP NO.234 OF 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH
REVIEW PETITION NO.234 OF 2023
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.7111 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
THE MANAGER PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LIMITED, BEHIND TALUK OFFICE COMPOUND, CHIKKABALLAPUR TOWN, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT – 577 601. REP. BY SRI. GOPALAKRISHNA, MANAGER.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VIVEKANANDA T.P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RP NO.234 OF 2023
…RESPONDENTS
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 12TH APRIL, 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7111 OF 2023 AND HEAR THE WRIT PETITION AFRESH IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Heard Sri. T.P. Vivekananda, learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner.
order dated 12th April, 2023 made in writ petition No.7111 of 2023.
RP NO.234 OF 2023
Annexure-N & O and extend all the benefits extended to the regular employees in terms of Employees service conditions Regulation of respondent Banks;
AND OTHERS reported in AIR 2013 SC 3301 and in the case of SRI. RAM SAHU (DEAD) THROUGH LR'S AND OTHERS vs. VINOD KUMAR RAWAT AND OTHERS reported in 2020 SCC OnLine SC 896 , petitioner has not made out a case for review. Accordingly, review petition is dismissed.
SD/JUDGE
ARK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has made out a case for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Whether the prayer for enhanced pay scale and benefits in the underlying writ petition warrants a review of the impugned order.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
KAMALESH VERMA vs. MAYAWATHI AND OTHERSFollowed¶35
KAMALESH VERMA vs. MAYAWATHI AND OTHERS reported in AIR 2013 SC 3301 · Who else cites this
SRI. RAM SAHU (DEAD) THROUGH LR'S AND OTHERS vs. VINOD KUMAR RAWAT AND OTHERSFollowed¶35
SRI. RAM SAHU (DEAD) THROUGH LR'S AND OTHERS vs. VINOD KUMAR RAWAT AND OTHERS reported in 2020 SCC OnLine SC 896 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
THE MANAGER PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LIMITED
THE MEMBER SECRETARY COMMON CADRE COMMITTEE FOR EMPLOYEES OF P.C.A. AND R.D.BANKS IN THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
SMT P.K. LATHA
SANDEEP G.M.
E.S. INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
