Sri S C Chenappaji v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a review petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 CPC seeking to recall an order that had quashed private respondents' seniority rankings.
What did the court decide?
The review petition for restoration of W.P. No. 13175/2015 was rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC:45912 RP No. 191 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT REVIEW PETITION NO. 191 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
- SRI. S.C.CHENAPPAJI, S/O LATE CHANNABASAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, WORKLING AS: ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CENTRAL-1 SUB DIVISION, HIGH GROUNDS MILLERS ROAD, VASANTHNAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 051.
PRESENTLY WORKING AT O/O ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DI SW-1, SUB-DIVISION, BWSSB, TULASI THOTA, CHIKKA LALBAGH, BENGALURU – 560 053.
Digitally signed by SUCHITRA M J Location: High Court of Karnataka
- SRI. NANJUNDAIAH K, S/O LATE KALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, WORKING AS: ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, EAST-23 SUB DIVISION, OMBR 1ST MAIN ROAD, EAST OF NGEF, KASTURINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 043.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order in W.P. No. 13175/2015 suffers from any jurisdictional infirmity.
Whether there is any error apparent on the face of the record warranting interference in this review.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sri. S.C. Chenappaji and Ors.
- respondent
The State of Karnataka and Ors.
Coram
S.G. Pandit
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- RP/191/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court