The first appeal filed under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 CPC was dismissed as non-prosecuted. The appellant did not appear despite the case being called twice, and the court had issued notice to respondents in July 2018 and received no response.
Appeal dismissed as non-prosecuted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:36628 RFA No. 822 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 822 OF 2016 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
SMT. MANJULA WIFE OF GOVINDARAJU AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.64, BALAJI NAGAR, 8TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN, RAMA MANDIRA TEMPLE, D.R.C. POST, BANGALORE - 560 029.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI.M.RAMACHANDRA REDDY.,ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by BHARATHI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AND:
5TH CROSS, LAKSHMI LAYOUT, GARVEBHAVIPALYA, BANGALORE-560 068.
…RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 R/W ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.02.2016 PASSED IN O.S.NO.5903/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE XXII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH NO.7), DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Case called out twice. None present on behalf of the appellant.
24.07.2018, till today steps are not taken to issue notice. Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution.
KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18
Sd/JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT. MANJULA WIFE OF GOVINDARAJU
SRI SURESH
SRI JAGGU
V SRISHANANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
