The High Court of Karnataka dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution as the newly served court notice was returned with an endorsement of 'door locked', as the counsel for appellants was no longer available and the appellants were unrepresented.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 657 OF 2015 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by BHARATHI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THE APPELLANTS ARE R/O NO.43, 5TH CROSS, R.M.V. EXTENSION, SADASHIVANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 080.
…APPELLANTS
(A1 TO A4 -UNREPRESENTED)
AND:
REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR MRS. AMRJIT KAUR
HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT MANGALORE AND BRANCH INTERALIA ONE AT SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027. REP. BY OFFICER/MANAGER
…RESPONDENTS
(R4 - NOTICE SERVED)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/S. 96 ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.09.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.9364/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, PARTLY DECREED THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Earlier appellants were represented by the
learned counsel, Sri.Chandrashekar Achar.
KAV
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15
Sd/JUDGE
SMT.K.T.RANJINI
SRI.M.R.RAJATH
SRI.M.R.RAHUL
SRI.M.R.RAKSHIT
MRS.AMRJIT KAUR
CORPORATION BANK
V SRISHANANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
