Smt.Sharadhamma v. Smt.Manjula
Case brief
What is this about?
In Regular First Appeal No. 624/2017 filed under Section 96 of CPC against a partition decree, the High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution. The appellants and advocates did not appear, while respondent counsel informed the court that the suit property had been sold.
What did the court decide?
This appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim application I.A.No.1/2017 stood disposed of.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
RFA No. 624/2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF MAY, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 624 OF 2017 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
- SMT. SHARADHAMMA W/O LATE H.H. VEERACHAR AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- SMT. BHADRAMMA D/O LATE H.H. VEERACHAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the regular first appeal should be admitted and heard in the absence of the appellants who were duly served.
Whether an ongoing ancillary interim application survives the dismissal of the main appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Sharadamma W/o Late H.H. Veerachar
- appellant
Smt. Bhadramma D/o Late H.H. Veerachar
- respondent
Smt. Manjula D/o Late H. Honnappachar
- respondent
Sri. Bhaskar S/o Late H. Honnappachar
- respondent
Smt. Usha D/o Late H. Honnappachar
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/624/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court