First appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellants failed to appear despite granted time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RFA No. 153 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF MAY, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 153 OF 2019 (SP)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by MALA K N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RFA No. 153 of 2019
(BY SRI. K.S.RAMESH, ADVOCATE [ABSENT] SRI.S.V.LAKSHMAN MURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR APPELLANT 4 {NOC NOT OBTAINED} [ABSENT])
AND:
THIS RFA IS FILED U/S.96OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.12.2010 PASSED IN OS.NO.738/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA DECREEING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT AND CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEF OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND ECT.,
RFA No. 153 of 2019
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR J ., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
None appears even in second call. Inspite of grant
of time on several occasions, office objections are not complied. Hence, this appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
KNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. S.V. Lakshman Murthy & Ors.
Sri. Ramesh B. Gowda & Ors.
P.S. Dinesh Kumar
T.G. Shivashankare Gowda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
