Sri Muniraju v. Sri Muniyamma
Case brief
What is this about?
No. 1936 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
No. 1936 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RFA No. 1936 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1936 OF 2018 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
S/O LATE SRI HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
D/O LATE SRI RAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
W/O LATE SRI MUNIRAMAPPA,
Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/OF SONNEDENAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN N., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
D/O LATE SMT VENKATAMMA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT SOONEDENAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK,
RFA No. 1936 of 2018
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.
ALL ARE R/OF KUMBALAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 AND ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF THE CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.07.2018 PASSED IN OS NO.519/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU (R) DISTRICT. BENGALURU DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION AND DECLARATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RFA No. 1936 of 2018
JUDGMENT
Though time was granted on nine occasions to comply
with the office objections, the office objections have remained un-complied. Left with no other alternative, the
appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
RK CT:SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18
SRI MUNIRAJU
SMT NAGARATHNAMMA
SMT MOTAMMA
SRI MUNIYAMMA
SRI ASHWATHAPPA
SRI ANANTHKUMAR
N S SANJAY GOWDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court