Appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC challenging a judgment dismissing suits for permanent and mandatory injunction. Appellant did not appear or prosecute. Court dismissed appeal for non-prosecution.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RFA No. 1849 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MAY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1849 OF 2013 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
MRS.KALAVATHI DEVI, AGE 48 YEARS, W/O RAMESH SINGH, NO.25, 1ST FLOOR, OPP:VALSALA TRAVELS, SAJJE PALYA,KAMAKSHIPALYA, BANGALORE-560 091.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VICTOR MANOHARAN S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by C MALATHI Location: High Court of Karnataka
(a) MR G KESHAVA KUMAR, S/O S A GANGADHARAIAH, R/AT NO. 4/1,5TH MAIN, AGRAHARA DASARAHALLI, MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE-560 079
RFA No. 1849 of 2013
MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE-560 079
…RESPONDENTS
RFA FILED U/SEC.96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.09.2013 PASSED IN O.S.NO. 8744/2007 ON THE FILE OF V-ADDL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND MANDATORY INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This Court, by order dated 27.01.2023 granted a week’s time to take steps in respect of respondents. Inspite of that, the appellant has not taken any steps in respect of respondents.
Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
CM/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mrs. Kalavathi Devi
Mr. G. Keshava Kumar
Mr. G. Suresh Kumar
H.T. Narendraprasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
