Smt. Papamma v. Jonnappa
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular first appeal against a partition suit judgment dismissed for non-prosecution due to failure to file office objections and pay costs despite a peremptory order.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; no costs.
What the court decided
- 1 -
RFA No. 1137 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF MAY, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1137 OF 2018 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
- SMT. PAPAMMA D/O JANAPPA W/O LATE SHANKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/A KONDALAHALLI GATE MUNEKOLALUR BANGALORE.
- SMT YALLAMMA D/O JONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
Digitally signed by NARASIMHA MURTHY VANAMALA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Parties & counsel
- appellant
PAPAMMA D/O JANAPPA
- appellant
YALLAMMA D/O JONNAPPA
- appellant
SUJATHA D/O JONNAPPA
- appellant
MUNIRAJU J S/O JONNAPPA
- appellant
VARALAKSHMI M J D/O JONNAPPA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/1137/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court