Smt Galamma v. Sri Venkatesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular First Appeal dismissed for default due to appellant's absence and non-compliance with office objections after multiple listings.
What the court decided
- 1 -
RFA No. 1507 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1507 OF 2018 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SMT. GALAMMA W/O. LATE MUNIHANUMAIAH D/O. LATE NAGAPPA .T AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.44, NEAR DURGAPARAMESHWARI TEMPLE, YEDIYUR, JAYANAGAR 7TH BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560 082. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by SUNITHA GANGARAJU Location: High Court Of Karnataka
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SMT. GALAMMA W/O. LATE MUNIHANUMAIAH
- respondent
SMT. RAMAKKA W/O. LATE VENKATESH
- respondent
SMT. RENUKA D/O. LATE VENKATESH
- respondent
SRI MANJUNATH B.V. S/O. LATE VENKATESH
- respondent
SMT. BYLAMMA W/O. LATE T. NAGAPPA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/1507/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court