Appeal against a decree in an original suit for specific performance dismissed by non-compliance with office objections.
Appeal stands dismissed without reference to the court due to failure to comply with office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD
DATED THIS 06th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE.HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR RFA NO 100035 OF 2022(SP)
BETWEEN
AGE 47 YEARS OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O BENADI TQ CHIKODI DISTRICT BELAGAVI.
APPELLANT
(By Sri K.ANAND KUMAR, Advocate )
AND
... RESPONDENTS
2
RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.09.2021 PASSED IN O.S NO. 58/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, NIPPANI, DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING;
One week time is granted to comply with office objections. Failing which, appeal stands dismissed without reference to court.
SD/JUDGE
Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 05/03/2024. The advocates for the appellant have not complied with the office objections. Hence, this RFA No. 100035/2022 stands dismissed as per the Court Order dated 06.12.2023.
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR .
R- By:-
C- By:-vk T- By: -psl
1 provisions across 1 enactments
AnnaSheb Babu @ Balu Ghalimatte
Maruti S/o Parashuram Soudate
Ravasaheb Babu @ Balu Ghalimatte
Sanjeevkumar Hanchate
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
