This single-judge order dismisses a revisional application filed by the appellant for non-compliance with court objections. The appeal is dismissed without reference to the court due to the advocate's failure to address specified objections within the granted time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD
DATED THIS 05th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE.HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
RFA NO 100168 OF 2023
BETWEEN
OCC. BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURE
R/O. SANGAM COLONY, ANAND NAGAR ROAD, OLD HUBBALLI
HUBBALLI
APPELLANT
(By Sri. S V KOPPAR, Advocate )
AND
DIST. DHARWAD
... RESPONDENT
RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.10.2022 PASSED IN O.S.NO.16/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS HUBBALLI, DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND PERMANENT INUJUNCTION.
2
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING;
Three weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections. Failing to do so, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court.
SD/JUDGE
Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 22.01.2024. The advocate for the appellant has not complied with the office objections at SI No.1 to 8. Hence, this RFA No. 100168/2023 stands dismissed without reference to the Court as per the Court Order dated 05.12.2023.
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR .
R- By:-
C- By:-vk T- By: -ran
SRI RAVI S/O NEELAPPA BANKAPUR
SRI NINGANGOUDA S/O BASANGOUDA PATIL
HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
