The High Court of Karnataka granted an adjournment for compliance of office objections in a miscellaneous second appeal under the PMLA. The appeal was subsequently dismissed for failure to comply.
Adjudication
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 84 OF 2018
BETWEEN
THE JOINT DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT BANGALORE ZONAL OFFICE, 3RD FLOOR, B BLOCK, BMTC, SHANTINAGAR - TTMC K H ROAD, SHANTINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560027 ….APPELLANT/S
(By Sri./Smt : H JAYAKARA SHETTY, P.KARUNAKAR, ADVOCATES)
AND
SHRI RAKESH SHANKAR KOLLUR S/O SHRI SHANKAR KOLLUR, NO 265, GUBBI COLONY, SEDAM ROAD, GULBARGA …RESPONDENT/S …2
MSA NO. 84/2018
2
THIS MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL FILED U/S.42 OF THE PRESENTATION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT., 2002, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 06.06.2018 PASSED IN FPA-PMLA1469/BNG/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT., AT NEW DELHI, ALLOWING THE APPEAL SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 24.03.2016 PASSED IN ECIR/12/BGZO/2009/AD-RR ON THE FILE OF THE OFFICE OF THE JOINT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, BENGALURU ZONAL OFFICE AND FILED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED26.07.2016 PASSED BY THE ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY UNDER THE PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT., 2002.
This Miscellaneous Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order:-
ORDER
Mr H Jayakara Shetty, learned counsel for the appellant.
Appeal is listed for the third time for compliance of office objections.
…3
MSA NO. 84/2018
3
However, learned counsel for the appellant once again prays for adjournment to enable him to comply with office objections.
By way of indulgence, two weeks’ time is granted to
comply with office objections failing which appeal shall stand dismissed without reference to the bench.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 22.06.2023, office objections are not complied, hence appeal shall stand dismissed.
COPY
Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By: SR R By: RG C By: BSL
Ty Date: 13.12.2023 C Date : 14.12.2023
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement
Shri Rakesh Shankar Kollur
Alok Aradhe
Anant Ramanath Hegde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
