MFA filed by appellant against divorce decree. Appellant's counsel sought and obtained leave to withdraw. Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution due to lack of interest.
Leave to withdraw granted; appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:21374-DB MFA No.3152 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3152 OF 2022 (FC)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
…APPELLANT
(BY SMT. MANJU S, ADV.,)
AND:
NR BUS STOP, BENGALURU-560008.
…RESPONDENT
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.06.2021 PASSED IN M.C.NO.1959/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1) (i-a) AND (i-b) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Mr.Manju S., learned counsel for the appellant
seeks leave of this Court to withdraw from the case. She is permitted to do so.
appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
RV
2 provisions across 2 enactments
MRS. SHALU JAIN
MR. ABHISHEK JAIN
ALOK ARADHE
ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
