Allowed

Sri Karthik v. Sri Raghu Vuduta

Karnataka HC19 Jun 2023MFA/5165/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Motor accident claimant appealed seeking enhancement of compensation. In Lok Adalat, parties settled. Appellant agreed to receive Rs.25,000 extra from Respondent Insurance Company. Appeal disposed via concordat, Tribunal award modified accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Respondent Insurance Company to pay lump sum of Rs.25,000 to Appellant in addition to tribunal award within six weeks.

Sri Karthik Vs Sri Raghu Vuduta — Insurance | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 19^TH DAY OF JUNE 2023

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.M.JOSHI

¶7

AND

¶8

MS. M.R. RASHMI, MEMBER

¶9

M.F.A.No. 5165/2021 (MV)

¶10

(Lok Adalat No. 1588/2023)

¶11

BETWEEN

¶12

SRI KARTHIK S/O (CHANDARAMMA) AND LATE ANJANAPPA

¶13

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

¶14

R/AT NEAR MUNESHWARA TEMPLE KAVERINAGARA, MAHADEVAPURA POST

¶15

BENGALURU RURAL – 560048.

¶16

...Appellant

¶17

(BY SRI. K.V. NAIK, ADVOCATE)

¶18

AND

¶19

SRI RAGHU VUDUTA

¶20

S/O V GANGADARA, MAJOR NO 910 2ND FLOOR, 1ST CROSS 1ST MAIN ROAD INDHIRA NAGARA 1ST STAGE

¶21

¶22

BENGALURU – 560038 RC OWNER OF THE MOTOR CYCLE BEARING REG NO KA-03-JC -3807

¶23

THE MANAGER

¶24

ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD NO.121, THE ESTATE 9TH FLOOR DICKENSON ROAD M G ROAD, BENGALURU – 560001 POLICY NO 3005/110284266/01/000 VALID FROM 30-11-2016 TO 29-11-2017

¶25

…Respondents

¶26

(BY SRI. B C SHIVANNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶27

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 01.09.2020 PASSED IN MVC NO.3580/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE X ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MACT, BENGALURU (SCCH-16), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶28

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶29

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶30

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present.

¶31

The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.

¶32

¶33

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent - Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the claims tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. We are satisfied that the settlement is just, proper and reasonable.

¶34

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶35

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of

¶36

the appellant / claimant, on proper identification.

¶37

¶38

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment of the Tribunal shall stands modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶39

Sd/JUDGE

¶40

Sd/MEMBER

¶41

Rbv

Sri Karthik v. Sri Raghu Vuduta

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Karthik v. Sri Raghu Vuduta

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Divisional Controller Vs Sri v Umesh

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs Siddegowda Since Deceased by His Lrs

The Divisional Controller Vs Sri Shivappa

Abrar Pasha Vs Manthan Rai K

Smt. Naryanamma Vs Mrs. Mamatha

Channakeshava S N Vs Manjunatha