Cheluvamba v. Padma
Case brief
What is this about?
Defendants appealed against an order granting temporary injunction in a partition suit. The High Court allowed the appeal, confirmed the injunction, and directed the trial court to dispose of the suit within eight months.
What did the court decide?
Appeal allowed; impugned order confirmed; suit to be disposed of within eight months; parties to cooperate.
What the court decided
- 1 - NC: 2023:KHC:39567 MFA No. 5713 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5713 OF 2022 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
- CHELUVAMBA W/O LATE NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
- SRINIVAS M.N. S/O LATE NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
- POORNIMA M.N. D/O LATE NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: High Court of Karnataka
- PRADEEP M.N. S/O M.N.NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT MARAPPANAPALYA VILLAGE DASANAPURA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-562 162.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the temporary injunction granted in the suit for partition should be quashed or confirmed.
What direction should be issued to ensure speedy disposal of the suit pending evidence.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
CHELUVAMBA W/O LATE NAGARAJU
- appellant
SRINIVAS M.N. S/O LATE NAGARAJU
- appellant
POORNIMA M.N. D/O LATE NAGARAJU
- appellant
PRADEEP M.N. S/O M.N.NAGARAJU
- respondent
PADMA D/O VENKATESHAPPA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- MFA/5713/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court