Dismissed
M/S Popular Front of India v. the General Secretary (Org)
Karnataka HCMFA/2767/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
2023:KHC:39565 MFA No. 2767 of 2022 IN THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
2023:KHC:39565 MFA No. 2767 of 2022 IN THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2767 OF 2022 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
M/S POPULAR FRONT OF INDIA REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT 1960 NO.5, 1ST MAIN, 4TH CROSS S.K.GARDEN, BENSON TOWN POST BANGALORE-560046 REPRESENTED BY ITS BANGALORE DISTRICT SECRETARY MR SHAIK BABAJAN S/O LATE SHAIK IBRAHIM AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MOHAMMED TAHIR., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: High Court of Karnataka
AND:
THE GENERAL SECRETARY (ORG) BHARTIYA JANTA PARTY(BJP) KARNATAKA STATE OFFICE AT NO.48, TEMPLE STREET, 11TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560003.
…RESPONDENT THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(c) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED:25.11.2021 PASSED IN O.S.NO.2420/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE 32ND ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 9 OF CPC.
NC: 2023:KHC:39565 MFA No. 2767 of 2022
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo
seeking leave of this Court to withdraw this appeal.
Sd/JUDGE
CM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15
2 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S POPULAR FRONT OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY MR SHAIK BABAJAN
THE GENERAL SECRETARY BHARTIYA JANTA PARTY(BJP) KARNATAKA STATE
H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court