Disposed

Smt Manjula S v. M/S Royal Sundaram Gic Ltd.

Karnataka HC19 Apr 2023MFA/371/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court Lok Adalat settled a motor accident appeal. The insurance company agreed to pay Rs. 2,75,000 as an enhancement to the Tribunal award. The appeal was disposed of upon filing a joint memo and modifying the original award.

What did the court decide?

Respondent agreed to pay Rs. 2,75,000 in addition to Tribunal award; appropriate interest if not deposited within six weeks.

Smt Manjula S Vs M/S Royal Sundaram Gic Ltd. — Insurance | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 19^th DAY OF APRIL 2023

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR &

¶7

SRI. P.D. SUBRAMANYA, MEMBER

¶8

M.F.A.No. 371/2023 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 239/2023)

¶9

BETWEEN

¶10

Smt. Manjula S. W/o Nagesh T., Aged about 36 years, R/at #41, 3^rd Cross, 1^st Main, Marappa Layout, Near Ideal Homes, Near Rajarajeshwarinagar, Bengaluru – 560 098. ...APPELLANT

¶11

(By Sri. K.T. Gurudeva Prasad, Advocate)

¶12

AND

¶13

M/s. Royal Sundaram GIC Ltd., No.30, 3^rd Floor, JNR City Centre, Rajaram Mohan Roy Road, Sampangirama Nagar, Bengaluru – 560 027, By its Manager.

¶14

Mr. J.V. Shivarudraiah S/o Late Veerabhadraiah, R/at No.41, F Road, Ideal Homes 2^nd Stage,

¶15

¶16

Rajarajeshwarinagar, Bengaluru – 560 098. RESPONDENTS

¶17

(By Sri. : Ravi S. Samprathi, Advocate for R-1)

¶18

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 12.09.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO. 7565/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDL. SMALL CAUSES JUDGE & XXIV ACMM, MEMBER, MACT, (SCCH-20), MAYO HALL UNIT, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶19

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶20

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶21

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present.

¶22

The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent –Insurance Company and along with its representative are present.

¶23

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed

¶24

by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs. 2,75,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs

¶25

¶26

Seventy Five Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

¶27

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶28

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant / claimant, on proper identification.

¶29

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint

¶30

memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶31

Sd/JUDGE

¶32

Sd/MEMBER

¶33

Rbv

Smt Manjula S v. M/S Royal Sundaram Gic Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Manjula S v. M/S Royal Sundaram Gic Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagaraj Vs Mallinath and Anr.

The Divisional Manager Vs Sania D/O Sharveershab Mulla

Jayasri and Ors. Vs Ramulu and Anr.

Sri. Shivannanaik Vs Sri. Raghu Ram Bhat. S

Sri R. Lakshmanappa Vs Sri Harsha B

K Jayamma Vs Divisional Controller K S R T C