Disposed

Sri R. Lakshmanappa v. Sri Harsha B

Karnataka HC19 Apr 2023MFA/227/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Lok Adalat conciliators disposed of a miscellaneous appeal regarding motor accident compensation. After negotiations, the insurance respondent agreed to pay an enhanced lump sum of Rs. 84,000 in addition to the tribunal award, with interest provisions for default.

What did the court decide?

Case disposed on settlement; Respondent to pay Rs. 84,000 lump sum enhancement with 9% p.a. interest if deposit delayed.

Sri R. Lakshmanappa Vs Sri Harsha B — Motor Accident Claims | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 19^th DAY OF APRIL 2023

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR &

¶7

SRI. P.D. SUBRAMANYA, MEMBER

¶8

M.F.A.No. 227/2023 (MV)

¶9

(Lok Adalat No. 115/2023)

¶10

BETWEEN

¶11

Sri. R. Lakshmanappa S/o Late Rangappa, Aged about 62 years, R/o Filter House Road, Near Post Office, K.B. Extension, Chitradurga Town-577 501. ...APPELLANT

¶12

(By Sri. B. Pramod, Advocate)

¶13

AND

¶14

Sri. Harsha B. S/o Basavarajappa, Major, Owner of Lorry Bearing Reg. No.KA-16/C-0602, R/o Main Road, Near Ganesha Temple, B. Durga, Holalkere Taluk, Chitradurga District-577 518.

¶15

The Branch Manager, Royal Sundaram General

¶16

¶17

Insurance Co. Ltd., Branch Office, Abharana Arceda, 2315/B1, 2068/B, 1^st Floor, M.G. Road, Tumkuru Town-572 101. RESPONDENTS

¶18

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 26.08.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO. 869/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE 1^ST ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MEMBER, MACT NO.IV, CHITRADURGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶19

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶20

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶21

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present.

¶22

The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent –Insurance Company and along with its representative are present.

¶23

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs. 84,000/- (Rupees Eighty Four

¶24

¶25

Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

¶26

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶27

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant / claimant, on proper identification.

¶28

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint

¶29

memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶30

Sd/JUDGE

¶31

Sd/MEMBER

¶32

Rbv

Sri R. Lakshmanappa v. Sri Harsha B

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri R. Lakshmanappa v. Sri Harsha B

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagaraj Vs Mallinath and Anr.

The Divisional Manager Vs Sania D/O Sharveershab Mulla

Jayasri and Ors. Vs Ramulu and Anr.

Sri. Shivannanaik Vs Sri. Raghu Ram Bhat. S

K Jayamma Vs Divisional Controller K S R T C

Smt Manjula S Vs M/S Royal Sundaram Gic Ltd.