The Lok Adalat settled the first appeal in a motor vehicle compensation matter. Respondents agreed to pay an additional lump-sum of Rs. 55,000 plus 9% interest to resolve the claimant's demand for enhancement.
Respondents to pay Rs. 55,000 plus 9% p.a. interest on demand to claimant as additional settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023
CONCILIATORS PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
&
SRI. ARJUN S., MEMBER
M.F.A.No.153/2023 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.754/2023)
BETWEEN
Mr. Prakash G.A. S/o Mr. Adviyappa, Aged about 53 years, R/at C/o Muniswamappa, No.124, I Main Road, Herohalli, Bangalore-560 091. ...APPELLANT
(By Sri. B. Keshava Murthy, Advocate)
AND
Kamakshipalya, Bangalore – 560 079. …RESPONDENTS
(By Sri. B.C. Shivanne Gowda, Advocate for R-1)
2
MFA FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 20.06.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO.4743/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE XXIII ADDL. SMALL CAUSES JUDGE & MACT (SCCH-25), BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED:
CONCILIATION ORDER
The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present.
The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.
3
memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/MEMBER
Rbv*
Mr. Prakash G.A.
M/s. The Shri Rama General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Mr. Manjunath B.L.
M.I. Arun
Arjun S.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
