Disposed

Vrushabhendra N v. Sri Sdiddaraju H

Karnataka HC12 Oct 2023MFA/1249/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court Legal Services Committee Lok Adalat conciliated an appeal challenging a Motor Vehicle Accident claim award. The parties reached a settlement where the insurance company agreed to pay an additional lump-sum amount to the claimant.

What did the court decide?

Settlement reached; respondent agreed to pay an additional Rs.1,35,000/- as lump-sum settlement in addition to the tribunal award.

Vrushabhendra N Vs Sri Sdiddaraju H — Motor Accident Claims | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 12^TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN

¶7

¶8

SRI. ARJUN S., MEMBER

¶9

M.F.A.No.1249/2021 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.2914/2023)

¶10

BETWEEN

¶11

Vrushabhendra N. S/o Nanjundaiah, Aged about 37 years, R/at D. No.31, Basavanapura Village, Chikkaiahnachatra Hobli, Nanjangud Taluk, Mysuru District – 571 301. ...APPELLANT

¶12

(By Sri. N.D. Manjunath, Advocate)

¶13

AND

¶14

Sri. Siddaraju H. S/o Honakaranaika,

¶15

Aged about 23 years,

¶16

R/at No.66, Sorahalli Village,

¶17

Nanjangud Taluk-571 312.

¶18

Sri. Somanaika H. S/o Honakaranaika,

¶19

R/at Soorahalli Village,

¶20

Nanjangud Taluk-571 312.

¶21

United India Insurance Co. Ltd., No.2912, “Sri Venkateshwara Plaza”,

¶22

¶23

1^st Main, Saraswathipuram, Mysuru – 570 009. …RESPONDENTS

¶24

(By Sri. Ravish Benni, Advocate for R-3)

¶25

MFA FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 31.01.2020 PASSED IN MVC NO.247/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE AND MACT, MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶26

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED:

¶27

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶28

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present.

¶29

The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.

¶30

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed

¶31

by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent - Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.1,35,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Five

¶32

¶33

Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full

¶34

and final settlement of the claim.

¶35

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A.

¶36

from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶37

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant / claimant, on proper identification.

¶38

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint

¶39

memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶40

Sd/JUDGE

¶41

Sd/MEMBER

¶42

Rbv*

Vrushabhendra N v. Sri Sdiddaraju H

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vrushabhendra N v. Sri Sdiddaraju H

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Durgappa Chouter Vs the Manager Ola Fleet Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Smt. Laxmi Devi Vs the Manager

Smt Shivamma Vs Icici Lombard Gic Ltd.

Mr. Prakash. G. a. Vs M/S the Shri Rama General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Smt Manjula Vs Ravinaika

Praveen Kumar Vs Ravinaika