Dismissed
State of Karnataka v. Kanesh Phakeerappa Bhovivaddar
Karnataka HCCRL.RP/100126/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
2023:KHC-D:12577 CRL.RP No. 100126 of 2020…
What the court decided
AI extract
2023:KHC-D:12577 CRL.RP No. 100126 of 2020…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC-D:12577 CRL.RP No. 100126 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100126 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR, MUNDAGOD POLICE STATION, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA, THROUGH THE ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRAVEENA.Y.DEVAREDDIYAVARA, HCGP)
AND:
Digitally
signed by
V N
V N BADIGER
BADIGER Date:
2023.10.30
12:19:35
+0530
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397(3) R/W 401 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.5021/2016 DATED 07/08/2019 ON THE FILE OF I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, U.K. KARWAR, SITTING AT SIRSI AND TO ALLOW THE APPEAL FILED BY THE STATE IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.5021/2016 DATED 07/08/2019 ON THE FILE OF I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, U.K. KARWAR, SITTING AT SIRSI AND SENTENCE WITH MAXIMUM SENTENCE AS PROVIDED UNDER SECTIONS 341, 448, 354(B),
355, 323, 504, 201 OF IPC BY CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE TRIAL COURT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
On 29.03.2021, at the request of learned HCGP
appearing for the revision petitioner/State, four weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again on 25.1.2023, 2.3.2023, 30.5.2023, 26.6.2023 at the request of learned HCGP appearing for the revision petitioner/State, time was granted to comply with the office objections. The office objections are not complied despite granting sufficient opportunity. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/JUDGE
VB
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5
State of Karnataka Represented by the Police Sub-Inspector, Mundagod Police Station, Dist: Uttara Kannada, Through the Addl. State Public Prosecutor, Advocate G
Kanesh Phakeerappa Bhovivaddar
Smt. Shashikala W/o Kanesh Bhovivaddar
Iravva W/o Phakeerappa Bhovivaddar
S. Rachaiyah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court