Dismissed
Santosh Dundappa Padmannavar v. Mallikarjun Mahadev Tarki
Karnataka HCCRL.RP/100034/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
2023:KHC-D:12576 CRL.RP No. 100034 of 2020…
What the court decided
AI extract
2023:KHC-D:12576 CRL.RP No. 100034 of 2020…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC-D:12576 CRL.RP No. 100034 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100034 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
SANTOSH DUNDAPPA PADMANNAVAR AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: ANJANEY NAGAR, M. M. EXTENSION, BELAGAVI, PIN CODE- 590003.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MAHANTESH S HIREMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
MALLIKARJUN MAHADEV TARKI AGE: 46 YEARS,OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: PLOT NO. 2734, SECTOR NO.12, M. M. EXTENSION, MAHANTESH NAGAR, BELGAUM, PIN CODE-590001.
…RESPONDENT
Digitally
signed by
V N
V N BADIGER
BADIGER Date:
2023.10.30
12:19:08
+0530
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/SEC.397(1) R/W 401 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 17/01/2020 IN CRL.APPEAL NO.331/2019, PASSED BY THE XI ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, BELGAUM AND CONFIRMING ORDER OF CONVICTION PASSED BY THE VII JMFC, BELAGAUM IN C.C. NO.453/2018 ON 21/08/2019 BE CONFIRMED AND THE SENTENCE PASSED BY THE LOWER COURT MAY KINDLY BE MODIFIED BY ENHANCING THE SENTENCE TO THE TUNE OF DOUBLE AMOUNT OF CHEQUE AND IN ADDITION TWO YEARS OF IMPRISONMENT AS PROVIDED UNDER NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT BY ALLOWING THE PRESENT APPEAL TO PROMATE AND BY ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
No representation for petitioner even in the second round of calling of cases. On 29.03.2021, at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, four weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again on 27.10.2022, 23.06.2023, 1.08.2023, 10.08.2023 at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections. The office objections are not complied despite granting sufficient opportunity. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/JUDGE
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6
VB
Santosh Dundappa Padmannavar
Mallikarjun Mahadev Tarki
S. Rachaiyah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court