Dismissed

Sri Ramesh Pai Sringeri v. Sri H P Kumar

Karnataka HC4 Aug 2023CRL.P/9024/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Karnataka High Court dismissed a criminal petition filed to transfer a case from Bengaluru to Udupi. The petitioner withdrew the petition with liberty to file a fresh application under Sections 329 and 330 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh application under Sections 329 and 330 Cr.P.C. before the Trial Court.

Sri Ramesh Pai Sringeri Vs Sri H P Kumar — Karnataka HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NC: 2023:KHC:27372 CRL.P No. 9024 of 2022

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 4^TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9024 OF 2022

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI. RAMESH PAI SRINGERI, S/O LATE VARADARAYA PAI, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, MENTALLY INFIRM,

¶9

Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶10

REPRESENTED BY HIS WIFE AND NEXT FRIEND SMT. SHANTI R. PAI, @ MANIPAL SHANTHA PAI, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, W/O RAMESH PAI S., RESIDING AT D-NO. 4-3-11, 'DEV-AASHISH', LAXMINDRA NAGAR, SHIVALLI VILLAGE, KUNJIBETTU POST, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT - 576 102. REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER, BALAKRISHNA SHENOY, S/O VASUDEV SHENOY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AJITH ANAND SHETTY, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

SRI. H.P. KUMAR, S/O H.D. PUTTAYA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.108, SRINIVAS, 16TH CROSS, M.T.S. LAYOUT, KENGERI,

¶13

¶14

NC: 2023:KHC:27372 CRL.P No. 9024 of 2022

¶15

UPANAGARA, BANGALORE - 560 060.

¶16

…RESPONDENT

¶17

(BY SRI. K.S.NARESH SANTHOSH, ADVOCATE)

¶18

THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 407 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO TRANSFER THE ENTIRE CASE IN C.C.NO.248/2021, INCLUDING ALL CASE PAPERS, CURRENTLY PENDING ON THE FILE OF HONOURABLE XXIII ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU TO A COMPETENT/JURISDICTIONAL HONOURABLE COURT AT UDUPI AND ETC.,

¶19

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file fresh application under Section 329 and 330 of Cr.P.C, before the Trial Court.

¶22

The memo reads as under:

¶23

"The petitioner seeks leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the present petition while seeking leave of this Hon'ble Court to reserve liberty for the petitioner to file a fresh application under Sections 329 and 330 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the learned Magistrate in the interest of justice."

¶24

NC: 2023:KHC:27372 CRL.P No. 9024 of 2022

¶25

¶26

In view of the said memo and supporting

¶27

submission, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh application under Section 329 and 330 of Cr.P.C.

¶28

Sd/JUDGE

¶29

SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18 CT: ABS

Sri Ramesh Pai Sringeri v. Sri H P Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Ramesh Pai Sringeri v. Sri H P Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajaykumar G v Vs Channakrishna Reddy

Sri. Sanketh. K. Vs State by Cubbonpark Police

Likith @ Nikhil Vs the State of Karnataka

Sandeep Kumar N @ Dilip Vs the State of Karnataka by

Sri Shashidar Vs the State of Karnataka

Mr Nagaraj a D Vs the State of Karnataka