Sandeep Kumar N @ Dilip v. the State of Karnataka by
Case brief
What is this about?
2023:KHC:27418 CRL.A No. 886 of 2022 IN THE…
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as not pressed after appellant filed memo stating case was infructuous.
2023:KHC:27418 CRL.A No. 886 of 2022 IN THE…
Appeal dismissed as not pressed after appellant filed memo stating case was infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:27418 CRL.A No. 886 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 886 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SANDEEP KUMAR N. @ DILIP, S/O MR. NARAYANA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, RESIDENT AT AGRAHARA STREET, WARD NO.10, MALUR TOWN, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 160.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. L. MALLESH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.14(A) (2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT, 2015 PRAYING TO A. SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 30.09.2021 REJECTING THE PETITION FILED BY THE APPELLANT U/S 438 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, FOR A DIRECTION TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT-POLICE TO RELEASE THE APPELLANT ON BAIL, IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST, IN SPL.S.C.NO.10/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE SECOND ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
NC: 2023:KHC:27418 CRL.A No. 886 of 2022
JUDGE, KOLAR WHO IS ARRAYED AS ACCUSED NO.9 BY ALLOWING, THIS CRL.A ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the
appeal has become infructous and he intend to withdraw the
same. He files memo.
The memo reads as under:
"I, the undersigned advocate for the appellant in the above appeal submits that the above Criminal appeal has become infructuous since the appellant has already been arrested by the respondent-police and subsequently the appellant is released on bail by the trial court and consequently the appellant is interested to prosecute the above appeal and hence the above appeal may kindly be dismissed as not pressed in the interests of justice.
In view of the said memo and supporting submission,
the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/JUDGE
SMC/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8 CT: BHK
Sandeep Kumar N. @ Dilip
The State of Karnataka by Malur Police
Mr. K. Kiran Kumar @ Sarathy
Shivashankar Amannavar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court