The CriminalPetition was dismissed for non-prosecution by the High Court of Karnataka. The petitioner was absent throughout and counsel requested an adjournment which was granted, but the subsequent hearing resulted in dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8006 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
SRI. WILLIAM ANOOP NICODEMUS S/O. LATE DANIEL RAJ MOHAN NICODEMUS AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO.G1104, TOWER-3, DAFFODILS BLOCK, ADARSH PALM RETREAT, DEVARABESINAHALLI, BELLANDUR, BENGALURU-560103.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. A.DERICK ANIL, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MS. SANGHAMITRA DAS D/O. KAMEDRANATH DAS, AGED 42 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO.G1104, TOWER-3, DAFFODILS BLOCK, ADARSH PALM RETREAT, DEVARABESINAHALLI, BELLANDUR, BENGALURU-560103. (BY SRI. AIYAPPA K.G., ADVOCATE)
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. AIYAPPA K.G., ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO QUASH THE CRL.MISC.NO.165/2020 PASS AN ORDER GRANTING PROTECTION FROM THE RESPONDENT DURING THE PENDENCY AND HEARING OF THE PRESENT QUASHING PETITION, PENDING BEFORE THE HONOURABLE M.M.T.C.-I, MAYO HALL, BENGALURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner.
counsel for the petitioner sought time and hence, the case was adjourned to today. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the petition.
prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
HJ
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI. WILLIAM ANOOP NICODEMUS
MS. SANGHAMITRA DAS
R. NATARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
