they entered into an agreement of sale in favour of the accused Nos.1 to 6 for a total consideration of Rs.3,90,00,000/- of which, the accused No.6 agreed to pay Rs.2,00,00,000/through five cheques for Rs.40,00,000/- each. These cheques were dishonoured when presented compelling the respondent No.2 and his family members to file separate cases for dishonour of cheques. It was later that the respondent No.2 decided to launch criminal prosecution against the petitioner, who was one of the persons who had purchased the property from the accused Nos.7 to 18. There is no allegation of any illegality or attempt to commit fraud upon the respondent No.2 by the petitioner. On the contrary, the petitioner was not arraigned as accused in PCR No.1189/2013 but was arraigned as accused No.2 in the charge-sheet. Except a stray allegation that the petitioner had joined hands with the other accused, no allegation is made against the petitioner and no material is collected against her. The investigating officer has not collected any material such as, partition deed of the year 1925 and the decree passed in O.S.No.193/1966. This apart, the accused No.6 has filed O.S.No.2539/2015 for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 30.10.2012 executed
