Sri Kumar v. Sri Shivakumar
Case brief
What is this about?
2023:KHC:44070 CRL.A No. 34 of 2018 IN THE…
2023:KHC:44070 CRL.A No. 34 of 2018 IN THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:44070 CRL.A No. 34 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 34 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
SRI. KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O NARASIMHULU NAIDU, R/AT NO.133, II CROSS, NAYAKA MAIN ROAD, JAI MARUTHI NAGAR, NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 096.
…APPELLANT (BY SRI. S.N.A. RAM, ADVOCATE(ABSENT)) AND:
Digitally signed by SOWMYA D Location: High Court of Karnataka
SRI. SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, S/O NAGAIAH, R/AT NO.25, I A CROSS, I FLOOR, RANGAPPA BUILDING, H.M.NAYAKA MAIN ROAD, JAI MARUTHINAGAR NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 096.
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. B. RAVINDRA PRASAD, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 08.12.2017 PASSED BY THE XIX ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, MAYO HALL UNIT, BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.10744/2015- ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT ACT.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
There is no representation on behalf of appellant
even during the second call.
The learned counsel for respondent is present.
The records disclose that on earlier occasion also the learned counsel for appellant did not represent the matter. Hence, it is evident that appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. As such, appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
DS
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15
SRI. KUMAR
SRI. SHIVAKUMAR
RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court