Dismissed

Sri. Pandurangappa v. Sri. Ranganath. P

Karnataka HC6 Dec 2023CRL.A/1303/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

O. 8th B of 2023 It. A, 2023 In re. Criminal Appeal No. 1303 of 2019 appealcrl determined a criminal appeal filed under S. 378(4) of Cr.P.C. regarding S. 138 of the N.I. Act. The court dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's absence and lack of interest in prosecuting it, thereby leaving the acquittal intact.

What did the court decide?

The criminal appeal was dismissed and the pending interlocutory application was disposed of.

Sri. Pandurangappa Vs Sri. Ranganath. P — Cheque Dishonour | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

1 - CRL.A No. 1303 of 2019 NC: 2023:KHC:44131

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR

¶6

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1303 OF 2019 (A)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI. PANDURANGAPPA, S/O SRI. RANGANATAHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO. 47, 1ST G MAIN ROAD, MSK NAGARA, GORGUNTEPALYA, BANGALORE - 560 022.

¶9

…APPELLANT

¶10

(BY SRI. KUMARA B, ADVOCATE (ABSENT) )

¶11

AND:

¶12

SRI. RANGANATH. P S/O. PUTTARANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT HOSAYELANDU AT POST, HIRIYUR TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.

¶13

Digitally HIRIYUR TALUK, signed by CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. SOWMYA D Location: High Court AND ALSO AT: of Karnataka PATTERN MAKER GARDEN CITY FASHIONS PVT. LTD., 84, INDUSTRIAL SUBURB, YESHWANTHAPURA, BANGALORE - 560 022.

¶14

…RESPONDENT

¶15

(BY SRI. N. RAMACHANDRA, ADVOCATE)

¶16

2 - CRL.A No. 1303 of 2019 NC: 2023:KHC:44131

¶17

THIS CRL.A IIS FILED U/S.378(4) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.03.2019, PASSED BY THE XIII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.22139/2015, ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF THE N.I ACT.

¶18

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

JUDGMENT

¶20

Learned counsel for the appellant is absent and learned counsel for the respondent is present.

¶21

On the last date of hearing also there was no representation on behalf of learned counsel for the appellant. The matter is pending since the year 2019.

¶22

Considering the conduct of the appellant, it is evident that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.

¶23

Hence, the appeal stands dismissed.

¶24

¶25

CRL.A No. 1303 of 2019 NC: 2023:KHC:44131

¶26

In view of dismissal of the main appeal, pending

¶27

interlocutory application does not survive for consideration and the same is disposed of.

¶28

Sd/JUDGE

¶29

URN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10 CT: BHK

Sri. Pandurangappa v. Sri. Ranganath. P

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Pandurangappa v. Sri. Ranganath. P

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B N Narayan Rao Vs D Rajkumar

Smt. Sundaramma Vs Smt. Rathnamma

State of Karnataka Vs Sri H Puttahanumaiah

Sri Kumar Vs Sri Shivakumar

A Prasad Vs Mudipalli Srinivasan Sivakumar

C G Muheebulla Vs Brijesh Mathew