Court dismissed criminal appeal filed under Section 378(4) CrPC because process fee for issuing notice to respondent was not paid. Order relied on preliminary record status.
Appeal dismissed due to non-payment of process fee for issuing notice to respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1941 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
SRI. AJITH KUMAR, S/O SRI. DINAKAR, OCC.LAB TECHNICIAN, R/AT NO.13, 3RD CROSS, 2ND STAGE, CHANDRA LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 040
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. LINGARAJ M, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SOWMYA D Location: High Court of Karnataka
SRI. SAMPANGIRAMAIAH G.C, S/O CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED BANK EMPLOYEE, R/AT NO.1059, 1ST FLOOR, AADARSH EXTENSION, 7TH CROSS, OPP. OLD SUB-REGISTRAR OFFICE, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 079.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S.378(4) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 25.08.2018 PASSED BY THE XXIII A.C.M.M., BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.11132/2016ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I ACT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant is absent.
not paid for issuing notice to the respondent.
Hence, the appeal stands dismissed .
Sd/JUDGE
URN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6 CT: BHK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow criminal appeal for setting aside acquittal on charge under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
SRI. AJITH KUMAR
SRI. SAMPANGIRAMAIAH G.C
RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
