Sri K B Nanjappa v. Sri Manjegowda
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka held that the criminal appeal under S.378(4) Cr.P.C. abated because the appellant died and the legal representatives failed to come on record and prosecute the matter despite being given multiple opportunities.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 - CRL.A No. 1126 of 2019 NC: 2023:KHC:45283
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1126 OF 2019 (A)
BETWEEN:
SRI. K.B. NANJAPPA, S/O LATE BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, BECHANAHALLI GRAMA, HALEKOTE HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK - 573 211, HASSAN DISTRICT.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. RAJARAMA S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SOWMYA D
Location: High Court of Karnataka
SRI. MANJEGOWDA, S/O NANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS MARASHETTY HALLI GRAMA, HALEKOTE HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK - 573 211.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal appeal stands abated due to failure of legal representatives to prosecute the matter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sri. K.B. Nanjappa
- respondent
Sri. Manjegowda
Coram
Rajendra Badamikar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.A/1126/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court