M/S Sigma Industries v. Sri Anand Pais
Case brief
What is this about?
In CRL.A No. 1143 of 2018, the High Court of Karnataka dismissed the criminal appeal. The appellant, appearing via advocate, was absent during the hearing. Without representation or prosecution of the matter, the appeal was rejected.
What did the court decide?
The appeals was dismissed due to the appellant's failure to appear and prosecute the matter.
What the court decided
- 1 - NC: 2023:KHC:44495 CRL.A No. 1143 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1143 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
M/S. SIGMA INDUSTRIES, A PROPRIETARY CONCERN, 'CRESENT EXELSIOR', FLAT NO.T 03, 3RD FLOOR, # 114, 1ST CROSS, GANGA NAGAR, R.T NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560 032, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI. A. SUNDARESHWARAN, SON OF SRI. K. DAMODAR NAIR, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
…APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHAKEEL AHMED, ADVOCATE (ABSENT) )
Digitally signed by USHA N S Location: High Court of Karnataka
AND:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal appeal filed under S.378(4) Cr.P.C. to set aside the acquittal of the respondent should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Sigma Industries, represented by Srian Sundareswaran
- respondent
Sri. Anand Pais
Coram
Rajendra Badamikar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.A/1143/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court