Disposed
Basavanneppa Kabadagi v. the State of Karnataka
Karnataka HCWP/8809/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
NO.8809 OF 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
NO.8809 OF 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP NO.8809 OF 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.8809 OF 2022 (EDN-RES)
BETWEEN:
WORKING AS PHYSICAL EDUCATION DIRECTOR C.S. BEMBALAGI COLLEGE, RAMDURGA. (REG NO.00709216010).
Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR M S Location: High Court of Karnataka
WORKING AS PHYSICAL EDUCATION DIRECTOR SRI. SATYA SAI INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, DHARWAD. (REG NO.00709216009)
WP NO.8809 OF 2022
WORKING AS PHYSICAL EDUCATION DIRECTOR GOVERNMENT 1ST GRADE COLLEGE, KALAGATAGI. (REG NO.00609216034).
WORKING AS PHYSICAL EDUCATION DIRECTOR GOVERNMENT 1ST GRADE COLLEGE, MUDDEBIHAL. (REG NO.00609216014).
WORKING AS PHYSICAL EDUCATION DIRECTOR GOVERNMENT 1ST GRADE COLLEGE, ILKAL. (REG NO.00609216039).
WP NO.8809 OF 2022
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. BASAVARAJAIAH NEGAWADI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
WP NO.8809 OF 2022
VIDYANAGAR, HUBBALLI DHARWAD DISTRICT – 580 021.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRAMODHINI KISHAN, AGA FOR R1; SRI. MAHENDRA GOWDA C.R., ADVOCATE FOR R2; RESPONDENT NO.3 SERVED & UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 TO PERMIT THE PETITIONERS TO SUBMIT THEIR PH.D DEGREE THESIS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION IN THE PRESENT FORM; TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 TO EXTEND THE TIME TO SUBMIT THE PH.D DEGREE THESIS IN THE PRESENT FORM AND TO CONSIDER THE SAME OF MERITS; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Respondents 2 and 3 herein are situated in the State of Andhra Pradesh and the relief sought for by petitioners cannot be considered for want of territorial jurisdiction.
Hence, writ petition is disposed of reserving liberty to petitioners to approach the appropriate jurisdictional Court, if so advised.
SD/JUDGE
ARK
BASAVANNEPPA KABADAGI
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DRAVIDIAN UNIVERSITY KUPPAM
E.S. INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court